Notification & Communications
alert, notify, message, email, mail, slack, teams, pager, pagerduty, sms, call, webhook, push, broadcast, mention, channel, thread, attach, subject, title, body, to, cc, bcc, urgent, critical, high, medium, low, quiet
Rocheston Agentic AI Cybersecurity Automation Platform
The modern language for Security Operations, Compliance, Evidence-Based Response, and AI-Driven Defense. Built for SOC analysts, security engineers, and compliance teams.
The Cybersecurity Programming Language for the Modern Era 🔥
Modern security operations are no longer "write code and deploy an app." Security today is continuous operations under pressure: detect threats, correlate signals, isolate systems, rotate credentials, contain breaches, preserve forensic data, restore services, notify stakeholders, and prove every action to auditors, regulators, and legal teams.
Traditional languages can do these tasks, but they treat them as scattered API calls and side effects. That creates brittle automation, inconsistent runbooks, missing evidence, and workflows only a few people truly understand. ZelC exists to eliminate that gap.
General-purpose languages treat security as something you bolt on with SDKs, YAML, and glue scripts. ZelC treats security as the native domain of the language. Actions read like security actions, not generic functions. Policies and intent are explicit. Guardrails are built into the execution model, so operations are safer by default and easier to review at high speed.
ZelC is built for "intent in, outcomes out." Humans can write clear, structured ZelC playbooks—and AINA can execute them as an agentic operator. Instead of hand-stitching integrations, you state the objective, constraints, and required proof.
ZelC is designed to be speakable, auditable, and capability-gated, so agentic workflows can run safely without creating hidden chaos.
In real security, the job isn't finished when the script runs. It's finished when you can prove what happened. ZelC makes evidence a first-class output of execution.
Every action can produce an immutable record: timestamps, attribution, chain-of-custody, cryptographic receipts, and compliance mapping—so evidence packs are generated as you operate, not months later in panic.
Security teams don't operate in one vendor's world. You operate across multiple clouds, multiple identity providers, multiple security tools, ticketing systems, and compliance frameworks. ZelC is designed to unify that reality with one operational model—so your workflows stay portable, consistent, and maintainable even as your environment evolves.
ZelC is designed to be readable at 2am, during active incidents, when clarity matters more than cleverness. Clear blocks, explicit intent, and structured execution reduce cognitive load for operators and reviewers. The goal is simple: faster containment, fewer mistakes, and stronger proof.
ZelC is being integrated into Rocheston Zelfire to power real security operations: threat response, orchestration, incident containment, posture validation, and evidence generation. This means ZelC is not an academic experiment—it's built to survive production reality and deliver operational outcomes.
Traditional languages (C++, Python, JS) are powerful — but they don't "speak security." In cybersecurity you don't want raw strings, fragile scripts, or glue code chaos.
You want:
ZelC is built for that reality.
ZelC code can't touch network/files/IAM/cloud/EDR unless the permission is explicitly provided. No hidden powers. No silent access. No mystery behavior.
Untrusted input is treated as untrusted until cleaned and verified. No accidental injection paths. No "oops" command strings.
Every decision and remediation can produce an evidence record with hash + provenance. So every run becomes audit-ready.
ZelC is built around security types and workflows:
IP, CIDR, Hash, UserId, IOCSet, Incident, Timeline, EvidencePack, RiskScore, ControlId
The engineering deep dive that answers: "Why can’t I just use Python?" — with concrete, line‑by‑line differences in safety, auditability, and operational control.
| Feature | 🐍 Python / Bash | 🛡️ ZelC (Rocheston) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Design Goal | App Development & Data Science | Kinetic Security Operations |
| Execution Model | Unrestricted (Can do anything) | Gated (Read‑Only by default) |
| Safety Architecture | None (Developer writes checks) | Kinetic Blocks (do...end enforcement) |
| Audit Trail | Text Logs (Mutable, Deletable) | Evidence Objects (Immutable, Crypto‑Signed) |
| AI Safety | Prompt Engineering (Hope & Pray) | Intent Validation (Compiler Contracts) |
| Cloud Integration | External Libraries (boto3, azure-sdk) |
Native Primitives (cloud.aws, cloud.azure) |
| Compliance | Manual Reports (After the fact) | Real-Time Proof (Generated at runtime) |
Task: Block a suspicious IP. Risk: Accidentally blocking internal networks or DNS.
import iptc # Third-party library (might be deprecated)
def block_ip(ip):
# DANGER: No validation. If ip is "127.0.0.1" or "0.0.0.0/0",
# you just killed the server.
chain = iptc.Chain(iptc.Table(iptc.Table.FILTER), "INPUT")
rule = iptc.Rule()
rule.src = ip
rule.target = iptc.Target(rule, "DROP")
chain.insert_rule(rule) # EXECUTES IMMEDIATELY
intent BlockThreat {
-- 1. CONSTRAINT: Compiler forbids blocking these ranges
exclude_scope: [localhost, internal_subnets, gateway]
}
define block_threat(target_ip)
-- 2. SAFETY CHECK: Analysis is free
set risk = threat_intel.lookup(target_ip)
when risk > critical
-- 3. KINETIC BLOCK: The only place action happens
do
-- Runtime checks 'intent' constraints here.
-- If target_ip is safe-listed, this fails safe.
firewall block ip target_ip
end
end
end
Win: ZelC prevents the fat‑finger mistake before execution via compiler‑enforced constraints.
Task: Revoke access and prove when it happened. Risk: Logs missing or altered.
def revoke_access(user):
try:
ldap.delete(user)
# TRAGEDY: If the script crashes here, no log exists.
# Or, a rogue admin can delete this line from audit.log.
with open("audit.log", "a") as f:
f.write(f"Deleted {user} at {time.now()}\n")
except:
pass
define revoke_access(user)
do
-- ATOMIC: Action and evidence are linked.
identity revoke user.id
-- Auto-anchored to Rosecoin Blockchain
evidence record "User Termination" details {
subject: user.id,
reason: "Data Theft",
compliance_tag: "GDPR.Art.17"
}
end
end
Win: Proof is transactional. If evidence fails, the action rolls back.
Task: AI agent responds to high CPU. Risk: Kills production database.
# AI generates this:
import os
# "To lower CPU, I will kill the most intensive process"
os.system("kill -9 $(pgrep postgres)")
-- 1. The Human Defines the Sandbox
intent FixCpuLoad {
allowed_actions: [service.restart, cache.clear]
prohibited_actions: [process.kill, system.shutdown]
}
-- 2. AI must cite the Intent
agent_action "optimize_performance" using FixCpuLoad
-- If AI writes 'process.kill', compiler rejects it.
do
service restart "web-server"
end
end
Win: AI can be smart, but is physically unable to be dangerous.
| Python Architecture | ZelC Architecture | |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime | Interpreter: Reads line, executes line. | Kinetic Engine: Analyzes Intent and Impact pre‑execution. |
| Permissions | OS Level: Root script is God. | Capability Level: Only explicit Intent grants apply. |
| Data Types | Strings, Integers, Lists. | Strings, Integers, IPs, Subnets, Evidence, Users, CVEs. |
| State | Transient (lost on exit). | Provenanced (variable history is tracked). |
Why switching to ZelC saves money:
Python is a Swiss Army Knife — great for many things, master of none in high‑stakes SOC operations. ZelC is a Scalpel — purpose‑built for surgical, auditable, AI‑safe security actions where failure is not an option.
Closing the Kinetic Gap with safety, evidence, and intent‑gated execution designed for agentic AI.
Why General-Purpose Languages Are Failing Security
We didn't need a better script. We needed a new physics.
The End of "Oops." In ZelC, destructive actions are impossible unless explicitly encapsulated in do blocks. The language enforces a "Read-Only by Default" execution model.
# DANGEROUS: No safety boundaries
import boto3
# This can delete production DB just as easily as it rotates a key
# ZERO distinction between operations
ec2 = boto3.client('ec2')
ec2.terminate_instances(InstanceIds=['i-prod-critical'])
# Result: Production is gone.
check SecurityResponse
-- SAFE ZONE: Analysis Only
-- AI agents explore freely. No side effects.
analyze threat_indicators
when risk_score > 90
-- KINETIC ZONE: Gated Actions
-- Requires explicit capability grant.
do
firewall block ip threat.source
evidence record "Threat blocked"
end
end
end
The Compiler is Your Auditor. ZelC treats evidence as a native data type, not a string. Every kinetic action automatically generates a cryptographic receipt anchored to the Rosecoin blockchain.
import logging
# Evidence = text logs
# Can be deleted. Can be tampered with.
logging.info(f"Blocked IP {ip_addr}")
# Verdict: Good luck proving this in court.
evidence {
action: "firewall_block"
target: ip_address
timestamp: now()
-- Automatic features:
chain_of_custody: true
crypto_signature: auto
ledger_anchor: rosecoin
compliance_mapping: ["NIST.IR-4", "SOC2.CC7.2"]
}
Guardrails for the AI Era. The intent block acts as a contract, preventing AI hallucinations from executing dangerous logic.
# AI Agent generates code -> Runtime executes it
def isolate_hosts(hosts):
# What if AI passes 1000 hosts?
# What if it's production?
for host in hosts:
shutdown(host) # YOLO
intent Isolate {
category: containment
risk_level: medium
constraints {
max_targets: 10
time_limit: 2h
requires_approval: auto
}
}
-- AI-generated code is validated against constraints
-- BEFORE execution begins.
"The industry has been trying to solve 21st-century security problems with 20th-century tools. We are asking AI Agents to defend our infrastructure, but we are forcing them to write Python—a language that has no concept of safety, evidence, or containment.
I created ZelC to solve the 'Kinetic Gap.' An AI Agent needs a language that prevents it from accidentally destroying the environment it is trying to protect. ZelC is that language. It is the safety layer for the Age of Agentic AI."
— Haja Mo, Inventor of ZelC
zelc export evidenceInnovations are only useful if they solve business problems. ZelC doesn't just change how you write code; it changes the economics of your security operations.
zelc export evidence.contain, remediate, snapshot) elevate roles to Defense Architects.(This replaces abstract claims with a concrete story)
Scenario: An endpoint in the Finance Subnet creates 500 encrypted files in 10 seconds.
intent RansomwareContainment.endpoint.isolate(target) (Instant)network.block_subnet(finance) (Prevent spread)evidence.record(snapshot) (Preserve proof)| Layer | Tooling | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1 (Detection) | Splunk, CrowdStrike, Datadog | The Eyes (They see the problem) |
| Layer 2 (Intelligence) | AINA (AI Agent) | The Brain (Decides what to do) |
| Layer 3 (Action) | ZelC | The Hands (Executes the fix safely) |
| Layer 4 (Proof) | Rosecoin | The Memory (Proves it happened) |
Verdict: ZelC is a JIT-Compiled Language with a Hardened Runtime.
It behaves like Python but runs with the safety guarantees of Rust.
"The End of Buffer Overflows"
Security tooling in C/C++ often fails due to memory errors. ZelC eliminates this class entirely.
| Feature | 🐍 Python | ⚙️ C++ | 🛡️ ZelC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pointers | No raw pointers | Manual (Dangerous) | None (Managed References) |
| Memory Leaks | Possible (GC Cycles) | Frequent (Manual free) |
Impossible (Scope‑Bound) |
| Buffer Overflow | Rare (Runtime Error) | Catastrophic (Segfault) | Impossible (Bounds Checked) |
No pointer arithmetic. No malloc/free. AI agents cannot read outside their sandbox. All references are managed.
Memory ties to the Kinetic Block. When a check or do scope ends, memory is reclaimed.
do exit, memory is vaporized — Zero Memory Leaks for ops tasks.Most languages stop at type safety. ZelC adds memory and kinetic safety.
String to IP_Address.check runs in its own lightweight thread. Run 1,000 concurrent checks without CPU thrash.
Semantic visuals that boost cognitive speed under pressure. Optional, but designed for 3 AM clarity.
Why should security code be a wall of grey text? ZelC introduces Semantic Visuals—a syntax that uses color and iconography to make code readable at a glance. It isn't just aesthetic; it's Cognitive Speed. In a 3 AM firefight, you don't read text. You recognize shapes. ZelC leverages this to help you parse threat logic instantly.
The ZelC Visual Mode (Optional but Recommended)
-- 🎨 ZelC Visual Syntax: ON
🔥 check RansomwareDefense
-- Integrations are instantly recognizable
☁️ on cloud.aws.guardduty
🐙 on git.repo.changes
-- Logic jumps off the screen
⚠️ when threat.velocity > CRITICAL_LIMIT
🚨 alert security_team "IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED"
-- The Kinetic Block is visually distinct
🛡️ do
⛔ block ip event.source_ip
🧊 isolate host event.hostname
-- Evidence is clearly marked
📝 evidence record "Kinetic Containment" {
🆔 id: event.id
📸 snapshot: true
🔒 chain_of_custody: rosecoin
}
end
✨ update ticket.status = "CONTAINED"
end
end
⛔ block at a glance — no line‑by‑line reading in a crisis.💀 kill outside 🛡️ do looks wrong on sight — visual guardrails catch mistakes early.A quick legend to show the method behind the madness.
| Icon | Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 🛡️ | Kinetic Gate | "Safety On/Off". The most important visual boundary in the language. |
| 🚨 | Alert | "High Urgency". Signals human notification. |
| ☁️ | Integration | "Cloud Native". Shows where the data is coming from (AWS, Azure, GCP). |
| 📝 | Evidence | "Legal Record". Marks the generation of immutable proof. |
| ⛔ | Deny/Block | "Stop Action". Immediate negative enforcement. |
| ✨ | State Change | "Update". Mutating a variable or ticket status. |
ZelC code is structured into sections that tooling renders as colored blocks:
Result: Your code reads like a SOC runbook — not a programming puzzle.
ZelC supports emojis in:
alert messages
containment messages
audit trail notes
completion signals
alert critical message "🚨 Possible key leak detected" notify slack channel "#soc" message "🔥 Containment started" evidence record "🧾 Evidence pack anchored" ticket close "✅ Incident closed"
ZelC vocabulary is designed to cover EVERYTHING in cybersecurity:
If it's cybersecurity — ZelC has a word for it.
run a ZelC program
format code
run tests
new project
packages
generate docs
security lint + taint verification
ZelC is built to power the entire Rocheston ecosystem:
SOC operations + containment execution
evidence packs + dashboards + reports
explain, correlate, recommend, generate reports
map controls, verify evidence, close gaps
anchor evidence, notarize reports, verify receipts
training labs, scorecards, certification workflows
check CloudKeyLeakResponse set repo = "rocheston/zelfire" when access_key_leak or secret_leak alert critical message "🚨 Possible cloud key leak" notify slack channel "#soc" message "🔥 Rotating keys + scanning GitHub" do aws rotate keys github scan repo repo for secret_leak noodles generate evidence_pack rosecoin anchor evidence_pack "latest" evidence record "Key rotation and repo scan" details { repo: repo } end end end
ZelC is a declaration:
Security deserves its own language.
Compliance deserves evidence by default.
Automation deserves guardrails.
The modern era deserves modern tools.
Rocheston ZelC Language 🔥
Write it. Run it. Prove it. ✅
ZelC is a domain-specific language designed specifically for cybersecurity operations, combining human-readable syntax with powerful automation capabilities for security teams.
Built-in "Safety First" pre-flight checks, taint analysis, and read-only-by-default execution model ensure your security operations never compromise security.
Every action creates immutable audit trails, compliance evidence, and blockchain-anchored proof artifacts for complete operational transparency.
Native integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, and major security platforms for seamless multi-cloud security operations.
Integrated AINA (AI Security Governance) for threat intelligence, anomaly detection, and intelligent security decision-making.
Explicit "do" blocks for state-changing operations, ensuring destructive actions are clearly visible and intentional.
Rosecoin integration provides cryptographic proof of operations, timestamps, and immutable evidence chains for compliance.
ZelC uses a Visual HUD Protocol with marginal icons to identify scopes and actions, abandoning traditional syntax in favor of intuitive visual indicators.
| Icon | Name | Keywords | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⭕️ | Scope Open | check, while, when |
Initiates a new logical block - the scope is "hot" and active |
| 🔴 | Scope Close | end |
Terminates the current block - sealed and "cold" |
| ⚡ | Kinetic | do |
State-changing operations (write, delete, block, ban) |
| 🔹 | Static | set, keep |
Read-only or memory operations |
| 📦 | Manifest Open | { |
Opens a structured data container |
| 🛑 | Manifest Seal | } |
Closes/seals a data container |
| ⚙️ | Config | keep, const |
Immutable system constants |
| Module | Icon | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| AINA (AI) | 🧠 | analyze, correlate - Deep Learning operations |
| ROSECOIN | ⛓️ | anchor, verify - Blockchain proof |
| CLOUD | ☁️ | aws, azure, gcp - Infrastructure |
| SECURITY | 🔒 | iam, access, lock - Permissions |
| ALERTS | 🚨 | alert critical - P0 interrupt |
| EVIDENCE | 📝 | evidence record, audit log - Compliance |
| DEFENSE | 🚧 | block, contain - Blast radius limits |
| DEBUG | 🐞 | trace, catch - Error handling |
| NOTIFY | 🔔 | message, ping - Operator awareness |
| CAUTION | ⚠️ | warn, dry_run - Pre-flight safety |
| HAZARD | ☢️ | nuke, sanitize - Hazardous ops |
ZelC files are strictly typed by their operational physics. The compiler enforces behaviors based on these visual markers.
| Extension | Context | The Kinetic Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| .⚡ | Source Code | Kinetic Energy. The live wire. Active code that can change state. Treated as “High Voltage.” |
| .⚙️ | Constraints | The Governor. Defines blast radius, rate limits, and safety boundaries. |
| .🔑 | Secrets | The Ignition. Keys to unlock kinetic action. Compiler auto‑adds to .gitignore. |
| Extension | Context | The Kinetic Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| .🔒 | Lockfile | The Anchor. Frozen supply chain dependencies; keeps build “weight” stable. |
| .📼 | Evidence | The Black Box. Immutable audit recordings; kinetic actions write to a .📼 tape. |
| .🧪 | Tests | The Lab. Sterile checks; runs in a disconnected vacuum, never touching production. |
| Extension | Context | The Kinetic Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| .📘 | Manual | The Instructions. Operator’s Handbook (SOP); replaces README.md. |
| .🐯 | Tiger | The Predator. Red Team / Adversary simulation; runs in sandboxed “Attack Mode.” |
| .🐞 | Debug | The Glitch. Crash dumps and error traces. |
| .📦 | Cargo | The Import. Sealed packages from the supply chain. |
Operators don’t read extensions under stress. ZFS provides a kinetic, visual cockpit.
config.json (Text) main.py (Text) deploy.sh (Text) audit.log (Text)
/critical_infrastructure_defense ├── main.⚡ # (Yellow) The Engine is LIVE. ├── safety.⚙️ # (Grey) The Limits are SET. ├── .master.🔑 # (Gold) The Keys are LOADED. ├── flight.📼 # (Black) The Recorder is ON. └── attack.🐯 # (Orange) The Simulation is READY.
.⚙️ Governor, .⚡ Engines do not compile..🔑 secrets to a public repo trigger a Critical Security Error..🐯 runs without OS write permissions, preventing real-world damage.Rajah the Tiger is the official mascot of Zelc—bold, colorful, and instantly recognizable. He represents what Zelc stands for: a visually stunning, AI-native cybersecurity programming language that feels fun to use, yet stays uncompromising about safety, verification, and evidence-driven engineering.
Rajah is Zelc’s fearless, friendly guardian—bright, playful, and instantly recognizable. A mascot that makes an AI‑native cybersecurity programming language feel fun, human, and approachable.
Zelc is a visually stunning language—bold, vibrant, and expressive, just like Rajah. Emoji‑native workflows and AI‑guided building keep every script clear, modern, and fast, so security engineering feels exciting instead of intimidating.
Rajah’s shield stands for Zelc’s core promise: safety built in, not bolted on. Evidence‑first engineering, verified actions, and guardrails that help developers ship confidently inside hostile digital environments.
Every reserved keyword, soft keyword, and platform integration mapped to executable command structures. This is the authoritative reference for the ZelC programming language.
The foundational binaries that drive the ZelC runtime and build process.
.zc playbook into an in-memory graph and executes it immediately.
Enforces "Read-Only by Default" until a do block is encountered.
check and do blocks into indented, colored tiers.
check blocks in "Simulation Mode." Mocks out network calls and
destructive actions to verify logic without touching live infrastructure.
The grammar of decision-making. These primitives structure the security narrative.
risk_score > 90),
the enclosed logic executes. Otherwise, it is skipped.
when condition fails.
Essential for "Default Deny" logic patterns.
catch block executes a safe fallback instead of crashing the pipeline.
Handling memory, constants, and state in ZelC security operations.
The "Proof-of-Work" for security operations. Every action leaves a trace.
Getting the message to the human in the loop during security incidents.
The verbs of defense: Detect, Contain, Eradicate.
Native controls for Amazon Web Services infrastructure.
Native controls for the Microsoft Cloud platform.
Native controls for Google Cloud Platform infrastructure.
Securing the microservices layer and container runtime.
Shift-left security: Pipeline integrity and code scanning.
Managing the risks of Artificial Intelligence in security operations.
Immutable truth and ledger operations for compliance and evidence.
The hands-on work of server management and system operations.
iptables or nftables to drop traffic from a source.
Host-level defense.
/etc/shadow or uses usermod to lock a local user account
on a Linux server.
chmod 600).
Protecting the transport layer and the application edge.
Protecting data at rest and in transit with modern cryptographic primitives.
********.
Hunting and analyzing the adversary with threat intelligence feeds.
The bureaucracy of security, automated through code-to-policy mapping.
Visualization and reporting commands for the Rocheston dashboard.
Future-proofing encryption against quantum computers.
Concise, voice-friendly phrases that map directly to executable ZelC syntax.
alert <severity> message "<text>" notify slack channel "<channel>" message "<text>" notify email to "<addr>" subject "<text>" body "<text>" notify teams channel "<channel>" message "<text>" pager <service> message "<text>" webhook to "<url>" body <object>
evidence record "<title>" details <object> proof make type "<type>" details <object> audit log "<event>" details <object> export report format "<html|json|csv|pdf>" to "<path>"
aws scan posture aws s3 block_public_access bucket "<name>" aws cloudtrail ensure on aws disable_access_key user "<user>" azure keyvault restrict network azure sentinel alert "<name>" gcloud iam disable serviceaccount "<name>"
docker run image "<name>" with <options> docker logs container "<id>" linux service "<name>" restart linux firewall block ip "<ip>" for <duration> apache2 reload nginx reload
when sqlinject then block ip for 2 hours when xss then open ticket title "<text>" when ssti then isolate host
github scan repo "<repo>" for secret_leak github open issue title "<text>" github comment pullrequest "<id>" message "<text>" github block merge when checks fail
ai summarize <events> ai explain <finding> ai classify <alert> ai score <incident> ai recommend <actions> ai extract ioc from <text> ai group alerts by <field> ai correlate <events> with <intel>
Official product nouns, workflows, and compliance extensions integrated into ZelC.
rocheston, zelfire, noodles, aina, rcf, rosecoin, rcce, zelwall, zelcloud, zelaccess, zelscan, zelrank, zeldrift, zelxdr, zelsoar, zelposture, zelai, zelmap, zelexploits, zelkill
rcce_mode, training, lab, exercise, scenario, runbook, playbook, drill, scorecard, grade, pass, fail, instructor, student, cohort, submission, evidence_pack, checkpoint, skills, badge, certificate
rcf_domain, control_id, control_map, mapping, implement, verify, evidence_required, evidence_found, gap, fix, waiver, exception, risk, risk_score, maturity, baseline, drift, continuous, attestation
dashboard, chart, report, evidence_index, evidence_hash, snapshot, export_html, export_pdf, export_json, audit_pack, timeline
signal, story, correlate, contain, respond, hunt, closeout, postmortem, lessons, automate, orchestrate, play, replay, rollback
aina ask aina explain aina summarize aina correlate aina decide aina recommend aina write_report aina generate_steps aina extract_ioc aina map_controls aina verify_evidence aina risk_score aina simulate
rosecoin anchor evidence_pack "<id>" rosecoin notarize report "<hash>" rosecoin verify receipt "<receipt>"
rcce start lab "<name>" rcce run scenario "<name>" rcce grade submission rcce generate scorecard rcce issue certificate rcce publish badge
rcf map "<standard>" to rcf rcf check domain "<id>" rcf verify control "<control_id>" noodles collect evidence from "<source>" noodles build dashboard noodles export report format "pdf" noodles generate evidence_pack
zelfire ingest <events> zelfire correlate <events> zelfire contain incident "<id>" zelfire isolate host "<id>" zelfire block ip "<ip>" zelfire revoke sessions user "<user>" zelfire close incident "<id>"
Soft keywords are reserved in keyword position only. They can still be used as identifiers in non-keyword positions if needed.
alert, notify, message, email, mail, slack, teams, pager, pagerduty, sms, call, webhook, push, broadcast, mention, channel, thread, attach, subject, title, body, to, cc, bcc, urgent, critical, high, medium, low, quiet
log, trace, note, tag, label, hash, sign, verify, stamp, redact, mask, scrub, sanitize, confirm, approve, policy, control, report, export, retain, timeline, summary, details, steps, nextsteps, compliance, audit, assessor, attestation, baseline, exception, waiver, risk, risk_score, maturity, drift, gap, fix, mapping, control_id, control_map
incident, case, ticket, open, update, comment, assign, owner, group, severity, priority, status, escalate, resolve, close
block, allow, deny, quarantine, isolate, contain, kill, disable, enable, lock, unlock, revoke, expire, rotate, reset, patch, rollback, snapshot, restore, delete, archive, move
siem, edr, iam, cloud, network, dns, proxy, firewall, waf, mailbox, storage, db, kube, cluster, registry, vault, kms, hsm
docker, container, image, build, pull, push, tag, run, exec, shell, logs, inspect, ps, start, stop, restart, kill, rm, prune, compose, stack, service, volume, mount, ingress, namespace, deploy, rollout, scale, node, pod
vpn, tunnel, route, gateway, connect, disconnect, split, full, wireguard, openvpn, ipsec, ssh, key, knownhosts, agent, forward, jump, bastion, rdp, sftp, scp
netcat, nc, listen, bind, port, socket, stream, packet, send, receive, relay, forward, proxy, socks, pivot, probe, banner, handshake, tls, cert, fingerprint, resolve, whois, traceroute, ping
linux, kernel, process, thread, pid, signal, service, daemon, systemd, unit, status, journal, useradd, userdel, groupadd, passwd, sudo, chmod, chown, umask, acl, package, apt, yum, dnf, apk, cron, job, schedule, file, folder, path, permissions, owner, mount, unmount, disk, memory, cpu, load, iptables, nftables, ufw, selinux, apparmor
apache, apache2, httpd, nginx, site, vhost, config, reload, rotate, http, https, headers, cookie, session, csrf, cors, ssl, certificate, chain, ca, ocsp, hsts, rewrite, redirect
attack, exploit, payload, vector, bypass, inject, sqlinject, xss, csrf_attack, ssti, rce, lfi, rfi, pathtraversal, ssrf, idor, authbypass, openredirect, clickjacking, deserialization, commandinject, headerinject, bruteforce, spraying, enumeration, test, scan, assess, benchmark, fuzz, mutate, simulate, dryrun, readonly, api, endpoint, route, graphql, rest, rate_limit, apikey, signature, hmac, openapi, swagger
malware, trojan, worm, ransomware, spyware, rootkit, dropper, loader, beacon, botnet, c2, callback, persistence, privilege, lateral, exfiltrate, phish, attachment, macro, lure, process_tree, inject_process, signature, yara, sigma, hunt
steganography, stego, hide, unhide, conceal, reveal, embed, extract, watermark, fingerprint, mark, obfuscate, deobfuscate, pack, unpack, covert, carrier, noise, channel, forensic_watermark, provenance_tag, ip_protection
crypto, cryptography, cipher, encrypt, decrypt, keypair, publickey, privatekey, secretkey, salt, nonce, iv, seed, hash, digest, checksum, sign, verify_signature, derive, kdf, hkdf, pbkdf2, scrypt, argon2, aes, chacha20, rsa, ecc, ed25519, x25519, tls, handshake, entropy, randomness, secure_random, postquantum, pqc, kyber, dilithium, falcon, sphincs, ntru, crypto_agility, hybrid_tls, pqc_migration, pqc_inventory, invent_cipher, invent_kdf, invent_hash, safe_mode, review_required
aws, amazon, azure, microsoft, gcloud, googlecloud, gcp, account, tenant, subscription, project, region, zone, resource, resourcegroup, tag, label, role, permission, principal, identity, user, group, serviceaccount, managedidentity, token, session, secret, keyvault, secretsmanager
vpc, subnet, route, gateway, nacl, securitygroup, ec2, ami, instance, volume, snapshot, s3, bucket, object, acl, publicaccess, cloudtrail, cloudwatch, alarms, lambda, ecs, ecr, eks, rds, dynamodb, guardduty, securityhub, inspector, macie, waf, shield, ssm, sessionmanager, parameterstore, organizations, sts
entra, aad, vnet, nsg, vm, scale_set, storage, blob, container, monitor, loganalytics, sentinel, functions, aks, acr, sql, cosmosdb, defender, defender_cloud, blueprint
organization, folder, cloudlogging, cloudmonitoring, compute, gke, artifactregistry, bigquery, secretmanager, securitycommandcenter
credential_theft, access_key_leak, secret_leak, token_theft, token_reuse, session_hijack, role_chain, role_escalation, privilege_escalation, assume_role_abuse, serviceaccount_abuse, managedidentity_abuse, suspicious_console_login, impossible_travel, new_country_login, new_device_login, mfa_disabled, mfa_bypass, password_spraying, bruteforce_login, api_spike, api_abuse, unusual_api_call, suspicious_api_call, resource_discovery, permission_probe, data_exfiltration, bucket_exfiltration, snapshot_exfiltration, log_tampering, cloudtrail_disabled, audit_log_deleted, logging_disabled, config_change, securitygroup_opened, firewall_opened, public_exposure, unencrypted_storage, malicious_lambda, malicious_function, malicious_container, registry_poisoning, image_tampering, supply_chain_attack, dependency_confusion, typosquatting, crypto_mining, mining_instance, cost_spike, billing_spike
windows, eventlog, sysmon, registry, powershell, wmi, winrm, gpo, activedirectory, domaincontroller, ldap, kerberos, ntlm, smb, rdp, bitlocker, defender, edr_agent
disable_user, enable_user, reset_password, lockout, unlockout, kill_process, quarantine_file, collect_memory, collect_artifacts
sast, dast, sca, sbom, secrets_scan, container_scan, iac_scan, codeql, semgrep, trivy, grype, syft, tfsec, checkov
terraform, cloudformation, arm_template, bicep, kustomize, helm, yaml, json
slsa, slsa_level, build_provenance, build_attestation, artifact_attestation, dependency_attestation, source_attestation, sigstore, cosign, rekor, fulcio, keyless_signing, transparency_log, in_toto, layout, link_metadata, attestations, sbom_signing, sbom_attestation, license_scan, license_policy, policy_gate, quality_gate, reproducible_build, hermetic_build
zero_trust, least_privilege, ztna, conditional_access, rbac, abac, continuous_verification, continuous_auth, device_posture, posture_check, trust_score, risk_based_access, step_up_auth, just_in_time, jit_access, breakglass, emergency_access, policy_engine, policy_decision, policy_enforcement, policy_point, pep, pdp
dfir, forensics, investigation, evidence_bag, chain_of_custody, preserve, acquire, triage, artifact, log_collection, cloud_artifacts, email_artifacts, browser_artifacts, host_artifacts, integrity_check, hash_verify, signed_evidence, notarize, provenance
ot, ics, scada, plc, rtu, hmi, historian, plant_network, safety_system, control_network, fieldbus, modbus, dnp3, opcua, profinet, ethernet_ip, bacnet, iec_62443, purdue_model, airgap, serial_gateway, vendor_remote_access, engineering_workstation, maintenance_window, protocol_whitelist, allowlist_control
mobile, android, ios, apk, ipa, mobile_app, app_store, play_store, mdm, mtd, device_policy, device_encryption, screen_lock, biometric, root, jailbreak, sideloader, app_signing, certificate_pinning, runtime_protection, mobile_malware, overlay_attack
browser, client, extension, plugin, cookie_theft, session_cookie, session_hijack, csrf_token, cors_policy, csp, content_security_policy, sandbox, same_origin, same_site, tabnabbing, mixed_content, referrer_policy, subresource_integrity, sri, x_frame_options, x_content_type_options, hsts_preload, phishing_page
email_auth, spoofing, impersonation, spf, dkim, dmarc, bimi, mailflow, mx, smtp, imap, pop3, quarantine_mail, release_mail, detonate, sandbox, attachment_policy, link_policy, url_rewrite, safe_links, safe_attachments, inbound_filter, outbound_filter, domain_reputation, sender_reputation, lookalike_domain, typosquat_domain, user_reported_phish
data_protection, privacy, pii, phi, pci_data, gdpr, hipaa, ccpa, dpdp, data_classification, classification, confidential, restricted, public_data, data_minimization, purpose_limitation, consent, data_subject, access_request, deletion_request, retention, legal_hold, data_residency, cross_border, tokenize, detokenize, anonymize, pseudonymize, dlp, encryption_at_rest, encryption_in_transit
password, password_hash, hashing, salt, pepper, bcrypt, scrypt, argon2, password_policy, min_length, complexity, history, rotation_policy, lockout, rate_limit, throttle, mfa_required, breach_check, credential_stuffing, recovery_flow, reset_token, session_timeout
asset, inventory, asm, attack_surface, exposure, external_scan, internal_scan, service_discovery, port_inventory, dns_inventory, subdomain, certificate_inventory, shadow_it, unknown_asset, internet_facing, public_endpoint, third_party, vendor, dependency, risk_register
protocol, service, dns, dnssec, dhcp, ntp, snmp, syslog, smtp, imap, pop3, ldap, ldaps, kerberos, ntlm, smb, rpc, rdp, ssh, telnet, ftp, sftp, http, https, http2, http3, quic, tls, mtls, bgp, ospf, ipsec, wireguard, openvpn, radius, tacacs, saml, oauth, oidc, jwt
iot, firmware, uefi, bios, secure_boot, tpm, attestation, device_identity, device_certificate, ota_update, firmware_signing, wifi, wpa2, wpa3, ssid, access_point, bluetooth, ble, nfc, rogue_ap, wireless_ids
pki, ca, intermediate_ca, root_ca, csr, crl, ocsp, certificate_rotation, certificate_expiry, certificate_inventory, key_usage, key_rotation_policy, pinning
resilience, availability, reliability, recoverability, durability, fault, failover, fallback, degrade_gracefully, maintenance_window, rpo, rto, dr_plan, disaster_recovery, business_continuity, backup, immutable_backup, restore_test, tabletop_exercise, incident_drill, game_day
threat_model, attack_tree, attack_path, data_flow, dataflow_diagram, trust_boundary, entry_point, threat, mitigation, assumption, abuse_case, misuse_case, stride, tampering, spoofing, repudiation, information_disclosure, denial_of_service, elevation_of_privilege, secure_engineering, secure_by_default, secure_coding, code_review, security_review, design_review, architecture_review, owasp, owasp_top10, owasp_asvs, asvs_level, security_requirements, security_controls, hardening, benchmark, cis_benchmark, cis_level, secure_config, configuration_policy
ai_security, ai_policy, model_risk, model_governance, model_inventory, model_version, training_data, data_lineage, data_poisoning, model_poisoning, prompt_injection, jailbreak_attempt, model_exfiltration, model_leak, sensitive_prompt, unsafe_output, guardrails, safety_filter, redteam, eval, benchmark, hallucination, drift, monitoring, audit_ai, explainability, model_card, incident_ai, aina_policy, aina_guardrails, aina_audit, aina_eval, aina_safe_mode
5g, edge, mec, ran, core_network, slice, network_slicing, slice_policy, slice_isolation, private_5g, base_station, gnodeb, ue, sim, esim, imsi, apn, carrier, roaming, handover, latency, qos, qci, throughput, 5g_security, ran_security, core_security, signaling, signaling_attack, diameter, gtp, gtp_tunnel, ipsec_tunnel, edge_gateway, nfv, vnf, cnf, orchestrator, zero_trust_edge, edge_firewall, edge_ids, edge_ddos
blockchain, chain, ledger, block, transaction, tx, merkle, consensus, node, validator, finality, immutability, contract, smart_contract, address, wallet, token, chain_security, contract_audit, key_compromise, wallet_compromise, phishing_wallet, rosecoin, anchor, notarize, timestamp, receipt, audit_trail, evidence_anchor, evidence_receipt, verify_receipt
Complete working examples demonstrating ZelC's capabilities in real security scenarios.
-- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -- Cloud Key Leak Automated Response Playbook -- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ check CloudKeyLeakResponse keep repo = "rocheston/zelfire" keep channel = "#soc" when access_key_leak or secret_leak alert critical message "🚨 Possible cloud key leak detected" notify slack channel channel message "🔥 Rotating keys + scanning GitHub" do -- Immediate key rotation aws rotate keys -- Scan repository for leaked secrets github scan repo repo for secret_leak -- Generate compliance evidence noodles generate evidence_pack -- Anchor to blockchain for immutable proof rosecoin anchor evidence_pack "latest" -- Record evidence trail evidence record "Key rotation and repo scan" details { repo: repo, channel: channel, timestamp: now() } -- Audit log entry audit log "ZelC run completed" details { action: "rotate+scan", repo: repo } end end end
-- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -- Brute Force Detection and Automated Response -- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ check BruteForceShield keep threshold = 12 keep block_duration = 2 hours when bruteforce_login alert high message "🚨 Brute force attack detected" do -- Get attacker details set attacker_ip = event.source_ip set target_user = event.username -- Block the attacker IP firewall block ip attacker_ip for block_duration -- Lock the targeted user account iam lock user target_user -- Notify SOC team notify slack channel "#security-alerts" message "Brute force from {attacker_ip} targeting {target_user} - BLOCKED" -- Create incident ticket ticket open title "Brute Force Attack - {attacker_ip}" severity "high" -- Evidence collection evidence record "brute-force-containment" details { attacker_ip: attacker_ip, target_user: target_user, attempts: event.attempt_count, actions_taken: ["ip_blocked", "user_locked"] } end end end
-- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -- Ransomware Detection and Automated Containment -- ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ check RansomwareContainment keep critical_hosts = ["prod-db", "prod-web", "prod-api"] when ransomware_detected alert critical message "🦠 RANSOMWARE DETECTED - INITIATING CONTAINMENT" do set infected_host = event.hostname set malware_hash = event.file_hash -- Immediate isolation edr isolate host infected_host -- Kill malicious processes each proc in event.suspicious_processes edr kill process proc.pid on infected_host end -- Quarantine the ransomware binary edr quarantine file event.file_path on infected_host -- Take forensic snapshot aws ec2 snapshot instance infected_host -- Check if critical infrastructure is at risk when infected_host in critical_hosts pager trigger message "CRITICAL: Ransomware on production host {infected_host}" end -- Multi-channel notification notify slack channel "#security-critical" message "🚨 Ransomware contained on {infected_host}" notify email to "[email protected]" subject "CRITICAL: Ransomware Incident" -- Open P1 incident ticket open title "Ransomware Outbreak - {infected_host}" priority "p1" severity "critical" -- Threat intelligence lookup set threat_intel = threat lookup hash malware_hash -- Generate comprehensive evidence pack evidence record "ransomware-incident" details { host: infected_host, malware_hash: malware_hash, processes_killed: event.suspicious_processes, threat_intel: threat_intel, snapshot_id: snapshot.id, containment_time: now() } -- Blockchain anchor for legal evidence rosecoin anchor evidence_pack "ransomware-{infected_host}" -- Compliance audit trail audit log "Ransomware containment completed" details { host: infected_host, actions: ["isolated", "processes_killed", "file_quarantined", "snapshot_taken"] } end end end
Complex real-world implementations showcasing ZelC's versatility across chess engines, network security, and DevSecOps pipelines.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ©️ ROCHESTON ZELC: ROSECOIN_CHESS_CORE.zc ⚖️ LICENSE: FIDE_CERTIFIED / PROPRIETARY 🆔 AUTHOR: Haja Mo 🏷️ VERSION: 1.0 (Checkmate Protocol) ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ package rosecoin.chess use aina, math, matrix, rosecoin, ui, network -- 1. GAME CONFIGURATION & CONSTANTS ⚙️ keep CHESS_PHYSICS = 📦 DIMENSION: 8 SQUARES: 64 TURN_LIMIT_MS: 3000 BLITZ_MODE: true 🛑 ⚙️ keep MATERIAL_WEIGHTS = 📦 PAWN: 100 KNIGHT: 320 BISHOP: 330 ROOK: 500 QUEEN: 900 KING: 20000 🛑 -- 2. STATE INITIALIZATION ⭕️ define initialize_board() note: Setting up the standard FIDE starting array. 🔹 set board_matrix = matrix.zeros(CHESS_PHYSICS.DIMENSION, CHESS_PHYSICS.DIMENSION) ⚡ do 🔹 change board_matrix[0] = ["R", "N", "B", "Q", "K", "B", "N", "R"] 🔹 change board_matrix[1] = ["P", "P", "P", "P", "P", "P", "P", "P"] 🔹 change board_matrix[6] = ["p", "p", "p", "p", "p", "p", "p", "p"] 🔹 change board_matrix[7] = ["r", "n", "b", "q", "k", "b", "n", "r"] 🔴 return board_matrix 🔴 -- 3. MAIN GAME LOOP ⭕️ check Grandmaster_Duel 🔹 set board = initialize_board() 🔹 set turn = "WHITE" 🔹 set game_active = true 🔹 set move_count = 0 ⚡ do ☁️ ui render matrix board 📡 notify slack channel "#live-chess" message "🏳️ Game Started" 🔴 ⭕️ while game_active is true -- STEP A: INPUT & PARSING 🔹 set raw_input = network.await_input(timeout=CHESS_PHYSICS.TURN_LIMIT_MS) ⭕️ when raw_input.timeout is true 🚨 alert warning message "TIME FORFEIT: {turn} ran out" ⚡ do 🔹 change game_active = false 📝 evidence record "Forfeit" details "Timeout at move {move_count}" 🔴 break 🔴 -- STEP B: AI ENGINE CHEAT DETECTION 🧠 set engine_eval = aina.chess.analyze(board) 🧠 set similarity = math.correlation(move_vector, engine_eval.best_move) ⭕️ when similarity > 0.99 and move_count > 10 ⚠️ alert warning message "ENGINE CORRELATION: {similarity}% detected" ⚡ do 📝 evidence record "Potential_Cheat" details 📦 move: raw_input.move player: turn engine_match: similarity 🛑 🔴 🔴 -- STEP C: KINETIC EXECUTION ⚡ do ⛓️ rosecoin anchor 📦 game_id: "WCC_2026_FINAL" move_seq: move_count notation: raw_input.move hash: math.sha256(board) 🛑 🔹 change move_count = move_count + 1 🔴 -- STEP D: CHECKMATE SCAN 🧠 set king_status = aina.chess.is_checkmate(board, turn) ⭕️ when king_status is true 📡 notify slack channel "#live-chess" message "🏆 CHECKMATE! Winner: {turn}" ⚡ do 🔹 change game_active = false 📝 audit log "Game_End" details "Checkmate on move {move_count}" 🔴 🔴 🔴 🔴
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ©️ ROCHESTON ZELC: BIOSEC_FIREWALL_SENTINEL.zc ⚖️ LICENSE: PROPRIETARY / CRITICAL_INFRASTRUCTURE 🆔 AUTHOR: Haja Mo 🏷️ VERSION: 4.2 (Zero Trust Protocol) ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ package biosec.sentinel use aina, net, aws, rosecoin, math -- 1. DEFENSE CONFIGURATION ⚙️ keep THREAT_MODEL = 📦 MAX_ENTROPY: 7.85 -- Encrypted/packed payload REQ_PER_SEC: 5000 -- DDoS threshold GEO_RISK_LIMIT: 85 -- AINA risk score TRUST_DECAY: 0.1 -- Reputation penalty 🛑 ⚙️ keep CRITICAL_ASSETS = 📦 DB_PRIMARY: "10.0.1.50" KUBE_API: "10.0.1.99" VAULT_CORE: "10.0.2.10" 🛑 -- 2. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PROTOCOL ⭕️ define analyze_packet_entropy(payload) 🔹 set entropy = 0.0 ⭕️ each byte in payload 🔹 set p = count / size 🔹 change entropy = entropy - (p * math.log2(p)) 🔴 return entropy 🔴 -- 3. MAIN SENTINEL LOOP ⭕️ check ZeroTrustGatekeeper 🔹 set traffic_stream = net.capture(interface="eth0", filter="tcp port 443") 🔹 set sentinel_active = true ⭕️ while sentinel_active is true 🔹 set packet = traffic_stream.next() -- THREAT A: ANOMALOUS PAYLOAD (AI INSPECTION) 🧠 set entropy_score = analyze_packet_entropy(packet.payload) 🧠 set ai_verdict = aina.net.inspect(packet) ⭕️ when entropy_score > THREAT_MODEL.MAX_ENTROPY or ai_verdict.is_malicious 🚨 alert critical message "MALWARE PAYLOAD: {packet.src_ip}" ⚡ do -- 1. Immediate IP Block ☁️ linux firewall block ip packet.src_ip duration "permanent" -- 2. Terminate Socket ☁️ net kill_connection packet.session_id -- 3. Forensic Evidence 📝 evidence record "Payload_Capture" details 📦 src_ip: packet.src_ip hex_dump: packet.hex ai_confidence: ai_verdict.confidence 🛑 -- 4. Blockchain Proof ⛓️ rosecoin anchor 📦 type: "Threat_Neutralized" threat_hash: math.sha256(packet.payload) action: "DROP" 🛑 🔴 🔴 -- THREAT B: VOLUMETRIC ATTACK (DDoS) 🔹 set current_rate = net.get_flow_rate(packet.src_ip) ⭕️ when current_rate > THREAT_MODEL.REQ_PER_SEC ⚠️ alert warning message "DDoS DETECTED: {packet.src_ip} @ {current_rate} rps" ⚡ do -- Update AWS WAF (Edge Blocking) ☁️ aws waf update_ip_set 📦 action: "INSERT" ip: packet.src_ip list: "Global_Blocklist" 🛑 📡 notify slack channel "#war-room" message "🛡️ Shield Wall Active" 🔴 🔴 -- THREAT C: GEOPOLITICAL COMPLIANCE 🔹 set geo_data = net.geoip(packet.src_ip) ⭕️ when geo_data.risk_score > THREAT_MODEL.GEO_RISK_LIMIT ⚡ do ☁️ net drop packet 📝 audit log "Geo_Block" details "Blocked {geo_data.country}" 🔴 🔴 🔴 🔴
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ©️ ROCHESTON ZELC: CI_CD_INTEGRITY_DAEMON.zc ⚖️ LICENSE: PROPRIETARY / SUPPLY_CHAIN_SEC 🆔 AUTHOR: Haja Mo 🏷️ VERSION: 2.2 (Hazard-Hardened) ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ package devsecops.pipeline use aina, git, docker, crypto, slack, rosecoin -- 1. POLICY CONFIGURATION ⚙️ keep RELEASE_POLICY = 📦 REQUIRE_SIGNED_COMMITS: true MAX_VULN_SEVERITY: "LOW" ALLOW_PRIVILEGED: false REVIEWERS_REQUIRED: 2 🛑 -- 2. PIPELINE EXECUTION ⭕️ check PipelineGuard(repository_path) 🔦 trace "Initializing pipeline for {repository_path}..." -- 🛡️ SAFETY WRAPPER (Error Handling) 🐞 try 🔹 set repo = git.open(repository_path) 🔹 set head_commit = repo.get_head() 🔹 set build_status = "PENDING" -- GATE 1: PROVENANCE VERIFICATION (GPG) 🔦 trace "Verifying GPG signature for {head_commit.hash}..." 🧬 set signature_valid = crypto.gpg.verify(head_commit.signature) ⭕️ when signature_valid is false 🚨 alert critical message "UNVERIFIED AUTHOR: Commit rejected" ⚡ do -- 1. Block Merge ☁️ git merge block reason "Unsigned Commit" -- 2. Log Incident 📝 evidence record "Bad_Actor_Attempt" details 📦 author: head_commit.author email: head_commit.email ip: head_commit.origin_ip 🛑 -- 3. Kill Pipeline stop 🔴 🔴 -- GATE 2: AI SECRET SCANNING 🔦 trace "Scanning for hardcoded secrets..." 🧠 set scan_results = aina.code.scan_secrets(repo.files) ⭕️ when scan_results.secrets_found > 0 ⚠️ alert warning message "LEAK DETECTED: {scan_results.count} secrets" ⚡ do -- 1. Sanitize the Evidence (Hazard Op) -- Scrub the actual key from logs so we don't leak it in the report ☢️ sanitize scan_results.report mask "****" -- 2. Scorched Earth Cleanup (Hazard Op) -- Completely destroy the compromised workspace to prevent cache leaks ☢️ nuke path "./build_artifacts" method "overwrite_3x" -- 3. Quarantine Code ☁️ git stash push --keep-index -- 4. Notify Developer 📡 notify slack user head_commit.author message "🛑 You committed an API Key" stop 🔴 🔴 -- GATE 3: SBOM & CONTAINER HARDENING ⭕️ otherwise ⚡ do 🔦 trace "Building container image..." -- 1. Generate SBOM 📝 set sbom = crypto.sbom.generate(repo) -- 2. Build Container 🐳 set image = docker.build(repo, base="gcr.io/distroless/static") -- 3. Vulnerability Scan 🧠 set vulns = docker.scan(image) ⭕️ when vulns.critical_count > 0 🚨 alert critical message "VULNERABLE DEPENDENCY: Build Failed" -- Dump the core for analysis before stopping 🔦 trace "Dumping vulnerable core state..." 📝 evidence record "Vuln_Dump" details vulns stop 🔴 -- 4. Sign Container Image (Cosign) 🧬 set image_sig = crypto.cosign.sign(image, key="prod_signer") -- 5. Anchor Release to Blockchain ⛓️ rosecoin anchor 📦 type: "Supply_Chain_Release" commit: head_commit.hash image_hash: image.sha256 sbom_hash: math.sha256(sbom) signer: "CI_Daemon_01" 🛑 -- 6. Deploy to Production ☁️ kubernetes apply image.tag namespace "production" 📡 notify slack channel "#releases" message "✅ Deployed v{repo.tag} securely" 🔴 🔴 -- 🐛 GLOBAL ERROR CATCHER 🐞 catch error -- 1. Log the crash path (The Search) 🔦 trace "CRITICAL PIPELINE FAILURE: {error.message}" -- 2. Seal the Evidence (The Record) 📝 evidence record "Pipeline_Crash" details 📦 error: error.message stack: error.stack_trace timestamp: now() 🛑 -- 3. Alert the SRE team (The Alarm) 🚨 alert critical message "Pipeline Crashed! Check logs." 🔴 🔴
endcheck is the top-level security logic unitdo is the action/remediation unit (kinetic zone)evidence, proof, audit are first-classdo block)keep for constants, set for variablestry...catchnote commentszelc test before productionzelc guard to catch security issues earlyzelc fmt for consistencyzelc doc gen
By Haja Mo • Founder and CTO, Rocheston
The industry loves calling things "modern" because it sounds like progress. Python is "modern." Rust is "modern." C++ keeps adding "modern." Java becomes "modern" every few releases. And yet—our security posture is not modern. Our incidents aren't modern. Our compliance isn't modern. The attacker certainly isn't modern; they're adaptive, relentless, and always three steps ahead. And the defender, too often, is still writing glue scripts like it's 2006.
Here's the contradiction nobody wants to say out loud: today's programming languages work. They work brilliantly, in fact. They have ecosystems. Libraries. Tooling. Vetted packages. Communities measured in millions. Decades of refinement. But the job has changed.
Security is no longer "write an app." Security is: connect clouds and identity providers, correlate signals across endpoints and network, contain breaches in real-time, recover systems under fire, prove what happened to lawyers and regulators, generate evidence on demand that holds up in court, explain decisions to humans and auditors who don't speak code—and do all of it continuously, under pressure, with milliseconds to decide and years of consequences.
The industry is living in an agentic AI era—yet most of our languages still assume the primary user is a human typing imperative code line-by-line, babysitting every detail, catching every edge case, manually orchestrating every integration. That assumption just became a liability.
We used to ask: "What code do I write?" Now the most powerful question is: "What outcome do I want?" Agentic AI isn't a chatbot novelty. It's not autocomplete for your IDE. It's a fundamental shift in the interface of operations. You state intent in natural language. The agent chooses and sequences actions across multiple systems. The system records evidence immutably. The workflow becomes replayable, auditable, and legally defensible. The output becomes something you can hand to a regulator or judge.
If you're still thinking like "write functions, manage imports, stitch APIs"—you're solving the problem the old way while your competitors are solving it the new way. Because the real competition isn't "better code." The real competition is faster certainty.
I'll say it bluntly: in security, the fastest team isn't the one that writes the most code. It's the one that reaches verified containment with the least cognitive load.
Python, Rust, C++, Java—these languages are incredible at what they were made for. Legitimately incredible. They power everything from spacecraft to financial markets to the device you're reading this on. They weren't made for this.
They don't encode security intent. Security actions usually look like strings and side effects. A "block this IP" might be a REST call buried
in a random file. A "rotate keys" might be a function named rotate()
in a utility module three directories deep. A "quarantine endpoint" is probably a vendor SDK call with parameters you have to look up every single time.
So what happens? No standardized safety gates. No standardized evidence trail. No standardized compliance mapping. No standardized replay or rollback semantics. No way for an AI agent to understand what you're trying to accomplish versus what you're literally executing. Every security operation is artisanally hand-crafted. Every time.
A modern security workflow isn't done when it runs—it's done when it's provable. Traditional languages treat evidence as "logs," or worse, an afterthought you bolt on with a logging library if you remember.
But in real-world security, evidence is the difference between "We think we fixed it" and "Here's what we did, here's when we did it, here's who authorized it, here's the chain-of-custody, here's the cryptographic proof, here's how it maps to our compliance obligations—and here's how you can verify all of it independently." One of those statements works in an audit. The other gets you fired.
People ask why Rocheston keeps building in places where others just talk. Because the cybersecurity industry has a habit of confusing marketing with innovation. Conference keynotes with actual products. Thought leadership with operational capability.
At Rocheston, our work is anchored in a simple idea: if you can't operationalize it, it isn't security. White papers don't stop breaches. PDFs don't generate evidence. Frameworks that exist only as documentation don't protect anything. Tools that can't integrate don't scale. And certifications that don't produce operational capability don't prove competence.
ZelC is not a framework. Not a library. Not a DSL that compiles to Python. A language. ZelC is built for a world where actions must be explicit (no hidden side effects), blocks must be readable (especially at 3am when everything's on fire), automation must be auditable (in court, under oath), and agentic commands must be first-class (not an afterthought).
ZelC can be emoji-forward and visually structured, because humans still have to read what we deploy under pressure. Because colorblind engineers exist. Because offshore teams need clarity. Because the SOC analyst responding to the alert at 2am needs to understand what this code does in ten seconds, not ten minutes.
But aesthetics isn't the point. The point is eliminating the gap between what we meant to do and what the system actually did. That gap has killed more security programs than any vulnerability.
ZelC supports speakable command phrases designed for agents—especially AINA—so instructions are short and operational: notifications, evidence generation, cloud isolation, container quarantine, DevSecOps scanning, incident response playbooks, and reasoning hooks like "analyze this anomaly and recommend next actions."
This is not "AI bolted on." This is designing the language assuming an AI operator exists from day one.
Think about what James Gosling did with Java in the 90s. He didn't just make C++ easier; he rethought programming for an internet-connected world. ZelC is the same kind of shift for the agentic security era.
A language isn't real until it ships inside a product that has to survive reality. ZelC is being integrated into Zelfire—Rocheston's security platform spanning firewall control, XDR, SOAR orchestration, incident response, posture and drift, and evidence generation that is court-admissible.
ZelC is not being designed as an academic language or a research toy. It's being designed as a security operations language: production-grade, battle-tested, built for real environments and real auditors asking hard questions.
People also ask: why couldn't Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Google, Oracle build something like this? They could build a language. They can't build ZelC for the same reason "one cloud to rule them all" never happened: incentives.
A unified cybersecurity language must integrate AWS, Azure, and GCP equally; identity providers; multi-vendor EDR/XDR/SIEM; ticketing; chatops; pipelines; and compliance frameworks. Would Microsoft build a language that gives first-class power to AWS and Google inside Azure workflows? Would Google normalize Azure governance verbs?
The limitation isn't engineering skill. It's strategic conflict. They need lock-in. A universal security language is the opposite of lock-in.
Rocheston doesn't sell cloud services. We don't sell EDR licenses. We don't profit when you stay locked into one ecosystem. We profit when you succeed at security. That alignment matters.
ZelC is not here to replace Python, Rust, C++, or Java in their native territories. Those languages will keep doing what they do best. ZelC is here to replace the most dangerous thing in modern cybersecurity: ad-hoc automation—glue scripts nobody owns, half-owned runbooks that only work when Steve runs them, scattered integrations held together with hope and duct tape, and tribal knowledge disguised as tooling.
The Python script that "works" but nobody dares to modify. The Bash automation that breaks when APIs change. The PowerShell nightmare that only runs on one laptop for reasons nobody understands. That stuff is killing security programs slowly and invisibly—until the day it fails during an active breach.
The next generation of security programming must be:
That is the thesis behind ZelC.
And that is why Rocheston is building it.
Because cybersecurity doesn't need another library.
It needs a new operating layer—where intent becomes execution,
execution becomes evidence, and evidence becomes trust.
The agentic era demands a different foundation.
Talk to AINA and get it secured.
That's not a slogan. That's the direction.
⚡ Launch ZelC Terminal NowHaja Mo
Founder and CTO, Rocheston